New Oscar Voting Rules

Joseph

🚬
Pronouns
He/Him/His
Joined
Feb 5, 2004
Messages
25,597
Location
MERIKA
IMG_1234.jpeg
IMG_1235.jpeg
 
Ooh, interesting. As someone who does take the time to watch everything now, this is quite welcome. I know there are only a handful of those anonymous Oscar voter ballots published every year, but it does get annoying when someone quite proudly states they didn’t bother watching a nominated film. Especially the shorts which take a lot of effort to seek out, and yet they get a nice handy special link.
 
So that might reduce the number of popularity/PR wins I assume?
 
So that might reduce the number of popularity/PR wins I assume?
Oddly the Hollywood Reporter mentioned calling it now “The Diane Warren Rule”, because aside from acting, the names of the nominees are apparently not revealed on the voting sheet. That implied that Warren hasn’t won based on the voters apparently not knowing the songwriter, which is frankly horseshit for that particular category.

I think it’s a bit weird to demand that everyone watch all the nominated films for Best Original Song though (although I do).

 
She really has written a ton of songs that probably deserved an award but looking at the list and what beat her, a majority had no chance.
 


I think it’s a bit weird to demand that everyone watch all the nominated films for Best Original Song though (although I do).

Yeah this is the easiest one of the lot, they just have to LISTEN TO THE FUCKING SONGS.
 
She really has written a ton of songs that probably deserved an award but looking at the list and what beat her, a majority had no chance.
The thing is, with 16 nominations, only the first 4 really stand out as significantly good and memorable. And only 2 of those 4 could have probably had a chance of winning

1987 - Nothing’s Gonna Stop Us Now lost to I’ve Had The Time of My Life
1996 - Because You Loved Me lost to You Must Love Me
1997 - How Do I Live lost to My Heart Will Go On
1998 - I Don’t Want To Miss a Thing lost to When You Believe

The other 12 noms? Mostly forgettable rubbish.
 
Having to watch the film seems like a good idea even for Best Song. It will reward songs that tie in to and enhance the film, rather than random pieces of music plonked on to the end credits.

Let the Grammys decide whether a song is good or not in its own right.
 
The thing is, with 16 nominations, only the first 4 really stand out as significantly good and memorable. And only 2 of those 4 could have probably had a chance of winning

1987 - Nothing’s Gonna Stop Us Now lost to I’ve Had The Time of My Life
1996 - Because You Loved Me lost to You Must Love Me
1997 - How Do I Live lost to My Heart Will Go On
1998 - I Don’t Want To Miss a Thing lost to When You Believe

The other 12 noms? Mostly forgettable rubbish.
As much as I despise that Aerosmith song, that was her best chance by miles.
 
Warren could justifiably have won for about a dozen songs in the 80s and 90s, but the songs she’s been nominated for this side of the millenium have invariably been utter shit.

It clearly only keeps happening because of her legacy and friends in the industry.
 
There are only about 100 voters in the Song branch, so they all definitely know who's entering what!
 
What's more exciting is Best Casting in 2026 and Best Stunt Direction in 2028 :disco:

They should also put the shorts into a pre-Oscars show like the Grammys do with their more obscure categories, and keep the main feast for the live telecast.
 
Could someone explain why people are linking Emily Perez to the new ruling?
 
Could someone explain why people are linking Emily Perez to the new ruling?
I have no idea. They don’t seem to understand how nominations are made. I keep just reading comments from people saying it got loads of nominations because voters hadn’t seen the other films? Made NO sense.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top Bottom