Phillip Schofield's Career DEAD? šŸ¤·ā€ā™€ļø The Castaway Years

www.bbc.co.uk

Phillip Schofield admits lying about relationship with younger ITV employee

The 61-year-old is leaving ITV with immediate effect as he apologises for misleading employers, his family and the public.
www.bbc.co.uk www.bbc.co.uk

"Schofield said his relationship with the young employee, who the BBC is not naming, was "unwise but not illegal"."

The entirety of that statement shows Phil's been telling a lot of PHIBS.
 
Oh, of course the Stop Fucking Hate are involved.
 
Did we see this from Popbitch yesterday?
>> Remote possibility <<
If you come at the king...

Realistically, what are the chances of Phillip Schofield appearing on ITV again? If you read Saturday afternoon's statements, you might have thought they were slim-to-middling. If you caught Monday's bloodless "tribute" to him on This Morning, you probably dialled them down another notch.

Behind the scenes, the odds are looking longer still.

Word is that Holly Willoughby didn't go to This Morning editor Martin Frizell to get Phillip axed. She didn't go to the channel's Managing Director Kevin Lygo either. Taking no chances, Holly went over both of their heads and brought her complaint to ITV's Chief Exec Carolyn McCall instead.

So if the order to kill Phil came right from the top, it's hard to see how he makes it back from here.
Click to expand...
 
I turned into GB News for some erudite debate about the issue (I particularly enjoyed someone from C4's THE GREAT BRITISH SEX EXPERIMENT accusing him of shagging young kids to the terror of the entire studio and legal department last week), but was greeted by Laurence Fox droning on about how the woke left have gone barmy.

Where is Kim Woodburn? Where is Lady C? Maybe Phil can get a job there now Celebrity Big Brother's no longer around.
 
Mugatu said:
I turned into GB News for some erudite debate about the issue (I particularly enjoyed someone from C4's THE GREAT BRITISH SEX EXPERIMENT accusing him of shagging young kids to the terror of the entire studio and legal department last week), but was greeted by Laurence Fox droning on about how the woke left have gone barmy.

Where is Kim Woodburn? Where is Lady C? Maybe Phil can get a job there now Celebrity Big Brother's no longer around.
Click to expand...
Whereas I'm off to my Phil Hate Site of Choice, the HAUS FRAU CESSPIT
 
COB said:
Did we see this from Popbitch yesterday?
Click to expand...
I don't understand what she complained about and on what basis - she doesn't like that her colleague slept with an 18 year old? Or that he told her a lie? These are not grounds to get someone fired!

Or is the story that he actually fucked him when he was a minor?
 
When is Holly supposed to be returning to This Morning?
 
Peekaboo said:
I don't understand what she complained about and on what basis - she doesn't like that her colleague slept with an 18 year old? Or that he told her a lie? These are not grounds to get someone fired!

Or is the story that he actually fucked him when he was a minor?
Click to expand...
Apparently not? He seems to have met him after he turned 16
 
What a spectacular fall from grace! :o

Surely his career for all intents and purposes is over?
 
20230526_212549.png
 
Star said:
Indeed. I don't condone any of his behaviour, what he did or didn't do. But I do hope there is someone out there looking after him so this doesn't go the way of Caroline Flack.
Click to expand...
that's exactly how I feel about this. the way this story is blowing up in a very hostile UK media environment makes me hope for his family's sake that nothing gets tragic.
 
Jark said:
that's exactly how I feel about this. the way this story is blowing up in a very hostile UK media environment makes me hope for his family's sake that nothing gets tragic.
Click to expand...
When ex-colleagues and supposed friends are taking the opportunity to pounce, it wouldn't surprise me.

Perhaps it would just be better that TV personalities didn't wield so much power... so there isn't a chance of something like this happening. "Golden handcuff" deals are frankly, ridiculous.
 
lolly said:
Why are some people so convinced Holly knew more?

WHY DO I CARE?
Click to expand...
Because EVERYBODY knew. There are no details to this story tonight that hadnā€™t been doing the rounds on Twitter for years already. It just is not feasible that it wasnā€™t already broadly known within ITV.
 
Pingu said:
Because EVERYBODY knew. There are no details to this story tonight that hadnā€™t been doing the rounds on Twitter for years already. It just is not feasible that it wasnā€™t already broadly known within ITV.
Click to expand...
So it isn't just Holly then - presumably it goes way above her.

Surely This Morning can't survive this, no matter who they shuffle into place?
 
Is this even more sordid than we have been led to believe?

I don't condone a witch-hunt against one individual, particularly if it's led by media personalities with their own agenda.
 
lolly said:
So it isn't just Holly then - presumably it goes way above her.

Surely This Morning can't survive this, no matter who they shuffle into place?
Click to expand...
There's a PB piece that has been doing the rounds that suggests that (what I assume was damage control) Holly went above the heads of two managers at This Morning to have Philip removed.
 
Thereā€™s some fairly damning evidence out there that suggests they first met when he was in his early teens, which even if nothing happened until he was 18+ certainly feels QUITE OFF.

The press seem to be avoiding this for now, but I doubt itā€™ll stay that way for long.
 
COB said:
There's only ONE PAIR that can save This Morning now.
MLJHlA.gif
Click to expand...
I'm quite shocked at how big This Morning actually is. Even when I'm off from work, I'll only watch live daytime TV in the background while I'm too ill to care, and even then the BBC Bargain Hunt and Homes Under The Hammer repeats would be preferable to anything on ITV.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: COB
Samuel said:
Thereā€™s some fairly damning evidence out there that suggests they first met when he was in his early teens, which even if nothing happened until he was was 18+ certainly feels QUITE OFF.

The press seem to be avoiding this for now, but I doubt itā€™ll stay that way for long.
Click to expand...
Itā€™s certainly implied in his statement that when they met, the guy was not legal. I know it just says he was ā€œa teenagerā€ but why is it worth mentioning at all if there werenā€™t a clear distinction to be made?

There are photographs and screenshots dating back to when the guy was 14 at least.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 1 (members: 0, guests: 1)
Back
Top Bottom